
Flare Hosts Threat Intelligence Workshop on Cybersecurity Challenges
/ 4 min read
Quick take - Flare recently conducted a Threat Intelligence Workshop led by Senior Threat Intelligence Researcher Tammy Harper, focusing on improving threat intelligence collection practices and addressing cybersecurity challenges, particularly in relation to the messaging platform Telegram and its evolving role in criminal activities.
Fast Facts
- Flare’s Threat Intelligence Workshop, led by Tammy Harper, focused on improving threat intelligence collection and addressed various cybersecurity issues, particularly regarding Telegram.
- The workshop highlighted Telegram’s recent CEO arrest and the platform’s efforts to collaborate with law enforcement to combat criminal activities.
- Threat actors are increasingly using Telegram over traditional dark web forums, while exploring alternatives like Signal and Matrix, which lack Telegram’s user experience.
- The workshop emphasized the challenges of Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) in threat detection and the importance of actionable threat intelligence for risk management.
- Flare’s Threat Exposure Management (TEM) solution aids organizations in detecting and mitigating threats by continuously scanning both clear and dark web sources for actionable intelligence.
Flare Hosts Threat Intelligence Workshop
Flare recently hosted a Threat Intelligence Workshop, led by Senior Threat Intelligence Researcher Tammy Harper. The workshop focused on enhancing threat intelligence collection practices and addressed a range of issues related to cybersecurity.
Key Topics Discussed
Recent developments involving the messaging platform Telegram were a key topic. Telegram’s CEO was arrested in August 2024, prompting the platform to collaborate with law enforcement to combat criminal activities proliferating on its platform. Known for its community-oriented features, Telegram has become a favored platform among threat actors, who are increasingly abandoning traditional dark web forums. Some malicious actors are exploring alternative platforms such as Signal, Sessions, Matrix, and Simplex; however, these alternatives do not offer the same user experience as Telegram. The platform’s capabilities for file support facilitate the sharing and storage of stolen information, raising concerns about the extent of its cooperation with authorities. There is potential for Telegram to evolve into a more moderated app, while Matrix has been noted for its higher potential for honeypotting, which may deter some threat actors from using it.
Challenges in Cybersecurity
In the context of cybersecurity, the workshop highlighted challenges with Indicators of Compromise (IoCs). IoCs are often clean, complicating detection efforts, and serve two main purposes: threat hunting and threat intelligence gathering. Threat hunting investigates specific incidents, while threat intelligence gathering focuses on information from the dark web relevant to an organization’s IT infrastructure. During incident responses, security teams ask targeted questions concerning compromised machines, information exfiltration, attacker traversal, and exploited vulnerabilities. Streamlining IoC data is crucial, focusing on observable evidence from systems, including abnormal network traffic, suspicious computer activity, file modifications, and anomalous user behavior.
Dark web threat intelligence plays a vital role in proactive threat identification, including data on attacks, exposed credentials, zero-day vulnerabilities, and compromised devices. The emphasis on actionable threat intelligence is essential for improving risk management and guiding security analysts to consider the implications of gathered information, such as potential damage, likelihood of attacks, and resource allocation for mitigation.
Flare’s Approach to Threat Intelligence
Effective intelligence requirements are framed around the need for specific information that contributes to decision-making processes. Flare tailors its research to provide insights on dark web activities that impact cybersecurity and business outcomes, including tracking card leaks and mapping observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). The goal is to differentiate between legitimate and malicious behaviors.
The workshop noted that threat intelligence gathering relies on a variety of sources and evidence, minimizing confirmation bias. Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is categorized into passive and active types, with both clear web and dark web sources offering valuable information. Flare has developed capabilities for tracking card leaks and evaluates threat intelligence sources based on their investigational benefit and value. Factors considered include participant activity, transaction frequency, admin connections to other forums, recency of activity, and discussions among cybercriminals.
Flare’s Threat Exposure Management (TEM) solution aids organizations in detecting, prioritizing, and mitigating exposures exploited by threat actors. Through continuous scanning of both the clear and dark web, the Flare platform identifies unknown events and provides actionable intelligence. Its integration into existing security programs is designed to be swift, potentially replacing multiple SaaS and open-source tools, thereby enhancing an organization’s overall cybersecurity posture.
Original Source: Read the Full Article Here