Framework Introduced for FPGA Bitstream Manipulation Risks
/ 3 min read
Quick take - The article discusses the versatility and security challenges of Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), highlighting a new framework for manipulating FPGA bitstreams that exposes vulnerabilities and emphasizes the need for improved protective measures in critical applications.
Fast Facts
- Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are reprogrammable semiconductor devices used in critical sectors like aerospace, military, and medical, but their reprogrammability poses significant security risks.
- A recent paper presents a framework for manipulating FPGA bitstreams with minimal reverse engineering, emphasizing the dangers of inadequate bitstream protection.
- The proposed methodology involves five steps: reverse engineering the bitstream, designing modifications, placing and routing modifications, and merging them with the original bitstream.
- Case studies demonstrate various manipulation techniques, including the extraction of signal traces and the introduction of hardware Trojans that can leak sensitive information.
- The paper calls for improved bitstream protection measures and suggests future research on countermeasures and adaptations for Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs).
Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) and Security Challenges
Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are versatile semiconductor devices known for their reprogrammability. This feature allows changes to their circuitry even after manufacturing. FPGAs are widely used in critical systems across various sectors, including aerospace, military, and medical devices. Their adaptability, rapid development cycles, and lower Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs make them popular. However, the reprogrammability of FPGAs presents significant security challenges.
Risks of Bitstream Manipulation
Manipulation of the bitstream can lead to unauthorized alterations of hardware circuits, resulting in potential data leakage and the introduction of hardware Trojans. A recent paper introduces a framework for manipulating FPGA bitstreams with minimal reverse engineering, emphasizing the risks associated with inadequate bitstream protection. The proposed methodology allows for precise modifications by inserting pre-synthesized circuits into existing bitstreams without requiring a comprehensive understanding of proprietary formats.
The framework consists of five key steps:
- Partial bitstream reverse engineering.
- Designing the modification.
- Placing the modification into the existing circuit.
- Routing the modification.
- Merging the modification with the original bitstream.
This approach was validated through four case studies focused on the OpenTitan design for Xilinx 7-Series FPGAs.
Inadequate Protective Measures
Current protective measures, such as bitstream authentication and encryption, are often insufficient and do not adequately defend against manipulation attacks. The paper highlights that FPGAs should only be trusted as anchors in secure systems when the risks of bitstream manipulation are effectively mitigated. The case studies demonstrate various manipulation techniques, including recording signal traces and modifying data flows. For instance, one case study involved extracting signal traces from the AES module for debugging, while another showcased a kleptographic Trojan that leaked the AES secret key by altering ciphertext output.
Additionally, modifications to CPU instructions were made to change the loading of encryption keys, and a final study injected sequences of instructions into the target application. The methodology’s efficiency lies in its limited requirement for knowledge of the bitstream format, although understanding these formats is crucial for effective reverse engineering and manipulation.
Countermeasures and Future Research
The threat model assumes that attackers could access and manipulate the bitstream and reprogram the FPGA, exposing vulnerabilities in FPGA designs when bitstreams are inadequately protected. The paper discusses various countermeasures against bitstream manipulation, including physical access protection, enhanced bitstream security, obfuscation techniques, and self-testing mechanisms.
In conclusion, the proposed method reveals significant vulnerabilities in FPGA designs, underscoring the need for robust bitstream protection. Future research is suggested to focus on evaluating these countermeasures and adapting the proposed approach for Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). Overall, this work contributes to the understanding of security risks in programmable hardware and highlights the necessity for improved protective strategies in safety-critical applications.
Original Source: Read the Full Article Here
